Date: 2007-10-04 11:13 am (UTC)
It's because 'people' has taken on connotations beyond "plural of person." It's semi-odd these days to see a number ascribed to 'people'; journalists and others will go to great lengths (52 individuals, 52 players, 52 young men, etc.) to avoid putting a number before the word 'people'. 'People' means the great mass of humanity; the population of the United States; the entire race of, say, Inuits; far beyond the simple situation of being a plural form of a noun. As a result, they have begun to use a simple adaptation to mean the plural form of the noun, which is in fact grammatically correct in English. This form is more correct, in fact, if you happen to be a strict declensionist (for lack of a better word), who wants *all* nouns to become plural by the addition of 's' at the end of the noun. It's a trend.

Yeah, I don't want "women" to become "womans" or "children" turn into "childs" either, but we're headed there... :-)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

jennlk: (Default)
jennlk

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 05:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios